Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant's agent requested withdrawal of the appeal by late email shortly before the hearing. Despite this request, the Tribunal hearing proceeded as scheduled. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal under Regulation 43(4) because no party representing the appellant attended or made submissions, with only the Valuation Officer in attendance. The Tribunal noted that had the withdrawal request been submitted timeously, the hearing could have been avoided.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ian Williams Limited, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 18 February 2026
Similar decisions
- 2nd Floor Unit G, Copse Walk, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Pontprennau, Cardiff CF23 8BB — Dismissed, 20 Feb 2026
- 2nd Floor Unit E, Copse Walk, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Pontprennau, Cardiff CF23 8BB — Dismissed, 20 Feb 2026
- Princes Trust 16, Ocean Way, Splott, Cardiff, CF24 5PE — Dismissed, 19 Dec 2025
- Units 25 & 26. Neptune Court, Vanguard Way, Splott, Cardiff, CF24 5PJ — Dismissed, 19 Dec 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.