Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction from £203,000 to £154,000 (£90/m²), arguing that the property was overvalued at £100/m². The appellant relied on the adjusted rent passing at £89.72/m² plus a fit-out allowance and settlement evidence from comparable retail warehouse properties. The tribunal found that the analysed rent of £89.72/m² from the subject property provided the most reliable indicator of value, that the valuation officer had failed to provide clear quantifiable justification for the £100/m² rate, and that greater weight should be attached to the rent passing on the hereditament itself rather than wider comparable assessments.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was NCF Furnishings, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 9 September 2026
Similar decisions
- 5-7 Picton Arcade, Swansea, SA1 3BH. — Dismissed, 28 Aug 2026
- Shop & Premises, 235-237 Oxford Street, Swansea, SA1 3BL Matter Appealed Against: 2023 Non-Domestic Rating List — Agreed at hearing, 17 Jun 2026
- 1A & R/O 1-7, Richardson Road, Swansea, SA1 3TQ — Allowed in part, 29 Apr 2025
- Stall 62 & 63, Swansea Market, Oxford St, Swansea, SA1 3AG — Allowed, 23 Jan 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.