Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to reduce the RV from £8,500 to £5,000, arguing the adopted valuation was inaccurate. The Valuation Officer presented evidence that the property had been valued using a Zone A underlying value of £100/m², the lowest level applied to retail units in the vicinity, with comparables in the area ranging from £100/m² to £160/m². The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding no evidence that the adopted level of value was wrong, that the appellant had not presented details of property disadvantages to justify allowances, and that while the appellant had invested considerable funds in the business, the tribunal could not reduce the RV to sustain it.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- tone_of_list_comparables
- Hearing
- 14 February 2019
Similar decisions
- Ground Floor York Chambers, York Street, Swansea SA1 3LZ — Dismissed, 23 Feb 2024
- 1011 & 1013 Carmarthen Road, Fforestfach, Swansea SA5 4AE — Dismissed, 28 Jun 2022
- Kings Club Snooker at Absolute Sports Group, Victoria Road, Gowerton, Swansea SA4 3AB — Allowed in part, 23 Feb 2022
- Public House & Premises, The Coracle Hotel, Conway Road, Penlan, Swansea, SA5 7BA — Agreed at hearing, 21 Apr 2021
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.