35 Blossom Street, M4 6AJ
Decided 3 March 2023 28677792
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to submit their statement of case to the tribunal or attend the hearing. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list correct due to the appellant's procedural failure and absence of substantive argument disputing the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- The Hut Group Icon, Manchester, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- THE HUT GROUP, ICON, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- The Hut Group Icon, Manchester, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- THE HUT GROUP, ICON, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.