The Hut Group Icon, Manchester, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP
Warehouse, office and premises Decided 9 January 2026 CHG101139110 CBRE - Mark Hayes
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 5 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a split site allowance of 7.5% to 10% on the basis that split site properties incur additional costs for equipment, facilities and staff movement. The tribunal allowed a 2.5% allowance for appeals 2, 3 and 5 (effective from 16 August 2021 onwards) but dismissed appeals 1 and 4. The tribunal found the site was not split as severely as the comparable property cited (FC Brown Steel Equipment) and noted potential advantages to the occupier from separation (e.g. studio away from warehouse for filming). Appeal 4 was dismissed as the hereditament had been superseded.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Hut.com Limited and The Hut Group, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- FC Brown Steel Equipment Ltd v Karl Hopkins (VO) [2022] UKUT 51 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Lassic Limited v J Moore (VO) CHG100894836; Molecular Products Limited v Valuation Officer CHG100818530; Domino's Pizza Group Ltd v Andrew Mouland (VO) CHG101094240; The Hut.com Limited v Hitchings CHG101075551
- Hearing
- 10 December 2025
Similar decisions
- THE HUT GROUP, ICON, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- The Hut Group Icon, Manchester, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- THE HUT GROUP, ICON, SUNBANK LANE, WA15 0TP — Mixed, 9 Jan 2026
- The Hut Group, Icon, Sunbank Lane, WA15 0TP — Allowed in part, 9 Jan 2026
All decisions in Manchester City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.