Bst 22, Sir Thomas Street, L1 6BW
Shop and premises Decided 1 December 2020 CHG100107427
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction in RV from £18,500 to £9,750 based on £52/m² for this basement shop premises, arguing the actual rent of £9,000 pa should be the starting point and relying on comparable properties. The Valuation Officer maintained the £100/m² assessment was reasonable, supported by stronger rental evidence from nearby Stanley Street properties which analysed to £109.52/m² and £114.90/m². The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the appellant's rent was not derived from an open market transaction and was merely a calculated 6% return on the 2012 purchase price; the best evidence came from the Stanley Street comparables which supported the £100/m² valuation.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 13 November 2020
Similar decisions
- 47 HOUGHTON WAY, ST JOHNS PRECINCT, L1 1LN — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2023
- UNIT 4, CHARLOTTE STREET, ST JOHNS PRECINCT, ST JOHNS PRECINCT, L1 1LD — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2023
- 141 CHARLOTTE WAY, ST JOHNS PRECINCT, L1 1NA — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2023
- 143 144 CHARLOTTE WAY, ST JOHNS PRECINCT, L1 1NA — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.