Tribunals · Harlow District Council · 2017 rating list

BUILDING 62, WEST ROAD, CM20 2BG

Industrial property Decided 18 May 2021 CHG100115322 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£101,000
Ratepayer sought£96,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£99,000from 1 Jan 2018

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 6 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant companies challenged six industrial properties on the basis that assessments were adversely affected by substantial roadworks from the A414 Edinburgh Way/Cambridge Road junction improvement scheme, which commenced 1 January 2018 and concluded 12 October 2020. The appellant sought a 5% allowance; the tribunal found the roadworks would have adversely affected the properties and the hypothetical tenant/landlord negotiations, but due to the location of the properties (accessed via River Way roundabout with approximately 2-mile diversions), awarded a 2.5% allowance rather than the 5% sought, allowing the appeals in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was European Watercare Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
road works
Evidence
Trading accounts, Photographs, Expert report
Hearing
12 May 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Harlow District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.