Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · South Gloucestershire Council · 2017 rating list

House Of Luxxe Ltd, 8 West Walk, BS37 4AX

Shop and premises Decided 28 September 2021 CHG100153080 Lambert Smith Hampton

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£28,000
Ratepayer sought£10,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (8 West Walk, Yate BS37 4AX). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
15 West Walk, Yate BS37 4AX£32,250£10,000—Dismissed
8 West Walk, Yate BS37 4AXThis appeal£28,000£10,000—Dismissed
10 – 12 West Walk, Yate BS37 4AX£63,000£21,500—Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to reduce rateable values for three retail units in a shopping centre based on rental evidence from a two-year lease at £10,000 per annum, arguing for a Zone A rate of £195/m². The tribunal found the appellant's rent evidence unreliable as it was based on affordability/viability rather than a genuine hypothetical market rent. The tribunal determined that the tone of the list for West Walk (£625–900/m²) was well-established through RSA discussions and settlements, and the original Zone A rates of £600–625/m² were at the lower end of this established tone, supporting the original assessments. The appeals were dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Claires Accessories UK Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; K Shoe Shops v Hardy; Futures (London) Ltd v Stratford
Hearing
13 September 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in South Gloucestershire Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.