Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

4TH F PT L FRNT AND REAR 6TH FS WOBURN HOUSE, 20 TAVISTOCK SQUARE, WC1H 9HQ

Offices and premises Decided 13 May 2025 CHG100162964 Ryan

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£410,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£340,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (4th Floor Part Left Front and Rear 6th Floors Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
4th Floor Part Left Front and Rear 6th Floors Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQThis appeal£410,000—£340,000Allowed
Part Basement Ground Mezzanine Floor Part Front and Rear & 1st – 2nd Floors Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ£610,000—£500,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the existing valuations of £410,000 and £610,000 were unreasonable, proposing reductions based on comparable evidence and rental analysis. The tribunal found the existing valuations at £425/m² to be unreasonable. Considering rental evidence from subject properties and comparables (particularly Dilke House properties agreed at £350/m² and accounting for differences in property specification), the tribunal determined that valuations at £345/m² were fair and reduced the entries accordingly to £340,000 and £500,000 effective from 1 April 2017.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Association of Commonwealth Universities and Universities UK, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson
Hearing
23 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.