4TH F PT L FRNT AND REAR 6TH FS WOBURN HOUSE, 20 TAVISTOCK SQUARE, WC1H 9HQ
Offices and premises Decided 13 May 2025 CHG100162964 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants argued that the existing valuations of £410,000 and £610,000 were unreasonable, proposing reductions based on comparable evidence and rental analysis. The tribunal found the existing valuations at £425/m² to be unreasonable. Considering rental evidence from subject properties and comparables (particularly Dilke House properties agreed at £350/m² and accounting for differences in property specification), the tribunal determined that valuations at £345/m² were fair and reduced the entries accordingly to £340,000 and £500,000 effective from 1 April 2017.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Association of Commonwealth Universities and Universities UK, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson
- Hearing
- 23 April 2025
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.