Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

Lipman & Sons, 4 Holborn, EC1N 2LL

Shop and premises Decided 13 July 2022 CHG100313953 Tom Emlyn Jones/Jones Norris Adams

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£57,500£1750/m²
Ratepayer sought£47,500
VO conceded first£54,500−5% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£50,500£1750/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant company challenged the rateable value of a Grade I listed shop on Holborn, seeking allowances totalling 17.5% (7.5% for shape and 10% for listed status effects) to reflect the passing rent of £47,500 pa. The Tribunal found that whilst the passing rent was agreed too far from the antecedent valuation date to carry weight, the disadvantages caused by the property's listed status (restricted use, expensive repairs, servicing requirements) and its irregular shape justified an allowance of 13% total, reducing the RV to £50,500 instead of the list entry of £57,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lipman and Sons, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Floor area or measurement
  • Relief or exemption
Evidence
Rents, tone_of_list_comparables
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner and Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
17 June 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.