Boots, 1 Queen's Head Passage, EC4M 7DZ
Shop and premises Decided 3 October 2023 CHG100858342 GL Hearn Limited - Star 2017
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
Boots Limited challenged the rateable value of £188,000 (£1,325/m²), proposing £147,000 (£1,035/m²), based on their renewal lease at £165,000 per annum. The tribunal found that whilst the subject rent should be the starting point, the weight attributable to the renewal lease was diminished because there had been no rent increase over a prolonged period (2004-2015), the landlord's valuation at lease renewal considered only one comparable, and Boots held a strong negotiating position as an anchor tenant. The tribunal found that comparable rental evidence from other Queens Head Passage properties and Foster Lane showed higher analysed rents, with the appeal property appearing as an outlier. The tribunal also found the increased rateable value reasonable given the appeal property's superior location with return frontage on Newgate Street and visibility on two streets. The appeal was dismissed and the original rateable value of £188,000 was confirmed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Boots Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 15 September 2023
Similar decisions
- Boots Ltd Western Mall (Inc Broadgate Link), Liverpool Street Station, EC2M 7PY — Allowed in part, 11 Aug 2025
- Bst-gnd Flrs 56-58, Cheapside, EC2V 6AR — Allowed in part, 20 Jun 2024
- Pt Gnd Flr, 95-100 Gracechurch Street, EC3V 0DQ — Dismissed, 6 Nov 2023
- Lipman & Sons, 4 Holborn, EC1N 2LL — Allowed in part, 13 Jul 2022
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.