Tribunals · London Borough of Richmond upon Thames · 2017 rating list

Unit 23, Station Point, TW9 2AD

Office and premises Decided 20 December 2024 CHG100694779 Hampton Lovett - Alexander Stevenson

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£16,250£265/m²
Ratepayer sought£13,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£16,250£265/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued for a reduction in the base rate from £265/m2 to £213.75/m2 and a 5% allowance for unconventional shape, citing two comparable properties at Forge Lane. The tribunal found that these comparables were in a different locality two miles away and not comparable to the appeal property. The tribunal was satisfied by the VO's comparable evidence of assessments within the same building at £265/m2, which supported the current valuation. The appellant provided no evidence to support the shape allowance claim, and the tribunal dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Scope AT Ltd, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
26 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Richmond upon Thames · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.