Tribunals · London Borough of Richmond upon Thames · 2023 rating list

1 ST FL, 14 CASTLE MEWS, HIGH STREET, HIGH STREET, TW12 2NN

Office and premises Decided 24 July 2025 CHG101087385 Roberts Vain Wilshaw - Paul Roberts

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£87,500£205/m²
Ratepayer sought£74,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£74,000£173/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the rateable value should be reduced from £87,500 to £74,000 based on the passing rent of £74,208 agreed in December 2021 at a rent review, which showed no increase from the 2016 letting. The tribunal found the subject property was let in Category B state (not Category A as the VO contended), and much of the tenant's £292,000 fit-out spend was business-specific upgrading for the small laboratory area that would not add value to a new tenant. The tribunal concluded the best evidence was the passing rent and the nil increase at the December 2021 review indicated the market did not support a higher value, so the RV should be reduced to £74,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Butterworth Laboratories Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Building works or disturbance nearby
Evidence
Rents, Expert report, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Bunyan v Acenden Limited
Hearing
10 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Richmond upon Thames · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.