SUITE 1A & 1B 1ST FLR HEALS BUILDING, TORRINGTON PLACE, WC13 7HJ
Office and premises Decided 11 July 2025 CHG100711450 Montagu Evans - Richard Wackett
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the rateable value of the office units was over-assessed at £650/m2, seeking reduction to £425/m2 based on rental evidence analysis and comparable properties within the same building. The tribunal found that the adopted rate should be £425/m2, applying significant weight to the majority of comparable properties in the building valued at this rate, and noting the VO had failed to revalue other properties in the building after reassessing the appeal property. The appeal was allowed and RV reduced to £200,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Shrewsbury Schools v Shrewsbury BC and Plumpton (VO); William Hill (Hove) Ltd v Burton (VO)
- Hearing
- 17 June 2025
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.