Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Hull City Council · 2017 rating list

69 A SCARBOROUGH STREET, HU3 4TG

Office and Premises Decided 3 July 2023 CHG100773704 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£8,800
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£8,800from 1 Oct 2020

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (69A Scarborough Street, Hull HU3 4TG). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
6 Beacon Way, Hull HU3 4AE£188,000—£188,000Dismissed
69A Scarborough Street, Hull HU3 4TGThis appeal£8,800—£8,800Dismissed
Unit E, Venture Business Park, Witty Street, Hull, HU3 4EL£8,700—£8,700Dismissed
Unit B Link 63, Liverpool Street, Hull HU3 4XT£24,250—£24,250Dismissed
Unit 3, Venture Business Park, Witty Street, Hull, HU3 4TT£13,500—£13,500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants sought a 2.5% reduction to the rateable values of five properties on the basis of a material change of circumstances caused by the A63 Castle Street Road improvement scheme, which they argued would cause road closures, lane narrowing, traffic diversions, and congestion affecting the properties. The tribunal found that the appeal properties, situated 0.6 to 1.44 miles from the scheme, had not been shown to be impacted to an extent that would affect a hypothetical tenant's rental bid, and that insufficient evidence had been provided to demonstrate the required impact despite the scheme causing disruption in the area.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Rradar Limited, RMC Digital Print, Ventilation Centre Ltd, Arco Limited & Humberside G.E.S Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
road works
Evidence
Photographs
Hearing
26 June 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Hull City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.