Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

PT BST GND MEZZ FLR PT FRONT AND REAR & 1ST­ 2ND FLRS WOBURN HOUSE, 20 TAVISTOCK SQUARE, WC1H 9HQ

Offices and premises Decided 13 May 2025 CHG100791410 Ryan

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£610,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£500,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Part Basement Ground Mezzanine Floor Part Front and Rear & 1st – 2nd Floors Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
4th Floor Part Left Front and Rear 6th Floors Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ£410,000—£340,000Allowed
Part Basement Ground Mezzanine Floor Part Front and Rear & 1st – 2nd Floors Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQThis appeal£610,000—£500,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the valuation of two office suites at Woburn House, arguing the tone of £425/m² was unreasonable for basic office accommodation with exposed utilities. The tribunal found the existing valuations were unreasonable by comparing rental evidence from the subject properties and similar properties including Dilke House (where hereditaments were agreed at £350/m²) and Alfred Place, whilst noting that Tavistock House represented superior accommodation. The tribunal accepted the appellant's revised proposal of £345/m², resulting in reductions to £340,000 and £500,000 for the two properties respectively.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Association of Commonwealth Universities and Universities UK, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Photographs, Expert report, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
23 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.