Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

4 TH FLR 33, ALFRED PLACE, WC1E 7DP

Office and premises Decided 13 May 2025 CHG100794283 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£108,000£575/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£108,000£575/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants sought a reduction in the tone applied to the valuations from £575/m2 to £475/m2, arguing that rental evidence and comparable properties supported a lower valuation. The tribunal examined rental evidence from properties in Alfred Place close to the antecedent valuation date, including rents from Remax House (£611.38/m2) and Whittington House (£627.64/m2), which supported the existing tone. Comparable properties initially relied upon by the appellants were either undated, prior to the 2016-17 refurbishment, or had themselves been altered in the rating list. The tribunal concluded that the existing valuations at £575/m2 were not unreasonable and dismissed the appeals.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ezoic UK Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson
Hearing
23 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.