133 134 & 134A, TOTTENHAM COURT ROAD, W1T 5BA
Restaurant and premises Decided 6 March 2024 CHG100811382 Altus Group
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended that a kitchen area of 59.98m² on the ground floor should be valued at 50% of the main space rate rather than at full rate. The tribunal found that without a structural wall separating the kitchen from the main restaurant space, the area had potential to be used as main restaurant space and that a landlord would not differentiate in rental levels. The tribunal concluded the appellant failed to demonstrate the existing assessment was unreasonable and dismissed the appeal, confirming the RV at £196,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Capital Arches Group Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Floor area or measurement · decisive
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 7 February 2024
Similar decisions
- 80 New Oxford Street, WC1A 1HB — Dismissed, 13 May 2026
- THE HOSPITAL, 24, ENDELL STREET, WC2H 9HQ — Agreed at hearing, 27 Feb 2026
- The Ship Tavern, 12 Gate Street, WC2A 3HP — Dismissed, 4 Mar 2025
- M196 1st Flr A1 Upper Lock, Hawley Wharf, Camden Lock, Commercial Place, Commercial Place, NW1 8RP — Allowed in part, 7 Jun 2024
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.