5 TH FLR 33, ALFRED PLACE, WC1E 7DP
Offices and premises Decided 13 May 2025 CHG100856470 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants sought a reduction in the tone applied to two adjoining office floors at 33 Alfred Place from £575/m2 to £475/m2, arguing this was supported by comparable evidence. The tribunal found the existing tone of £575/m2 was reasonable, being supported by rents agreed at nearby properties in Alfred Place close to the valuation date, specifically rents at Remax House and Whittington House which analysed to £611.38/m2 and £627.64/m2 respectively. The appellant's comparable examples were either too far from the subject property, explained by inferior accommodation standards, or had since been altered to higher valuations in the rating list.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ezoic UK Ltd and Big Light Productions Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson
- Hearing
- 23 April 2025
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.