2nd Flr South 23 Savile Row, W1S 2ET
Offices and premises Decided 7 August 2025 CHG101063845 CBRE - Ben Moore
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the main space rate of £1,100/m² applied to offices at 23 Savile Row, seeking reduction to £950/m². They relied on rental evidence from comparable properties at 24 Savile Row, 10 New Burlington Street, and 1 New Burlington Place. The tribunal found the subject properties superior in quality and design, featuring unique architecture, modern glazing on three sides, a skylight atrium, and column-free space on its own island site. The tribunal was not convinced the rental evidence demonstrated the assessed rate was excessive and dismissed the appeals, finding the £1,100/m² rate reasonable and reflecting the subject properties' superior quality compared to the comparable properties.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 9 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.