Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

3rd Flr 23 Savile Row, W1S 2ET

Offices and premises Decided 7 August 2025 CHG101063864 CBRE

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£1,690,000
Ratepayer sought£1,460,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£1,690,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (3RD FLR, 23 SAVILE ROW, LONDON, W1S 2ET). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
2ND FLR SOUTH, 23 SAVILE ROW, LONDON, W1S 2ET£685,000£590,000£685,000Dismissed
2ND FLR SOUTH, 23 SAVILE ROW, LONDON, W1S 2ET£720,000£620,000£720,000Dismissed
3RD FLR, 23 SAVILE ROW, LONDON, W1S 2ETThis appeal£1,690,000£1,460,000£1,690,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants contended that the unadjusted rate (UAR) of £1,100/m² applied to both subject properties was excessive and should be reduced to £950/m². The Tribunal found that whilst the rental evidence was not persuasive on its own, the subject properties at 23 Savile Row were superior in quality to the comparable properties cited, featuring distinctive architecture and design that justified the higher rate. The Tribunal was satisfied that the existing assessments of £685,000, £720,000, and £1,690,000 were not unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
9 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.