ADVERTISING SITE 0403 0105 OPP 63 STATION ROAD, KIVETON PARK, S26 6QP
Advertising rights and premises; digital display bus shelter sites Decided 14 November 2024 CHG101096054 Montagu Evans - Richard Wackett
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 21 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended that digital advertising displays should be valued at the base static rate with no uplift, arguing the digital mechanism was not rateable and the VO's uplift of six times was excessive and unsubstantiated. The tribunal found that while digital advertisements are more valuable than static ones, the VO's uplift of six was excessive. The tribunal allowed the appeals in part by determining a multiplier of three (rather than six) should be applied to the VOA's static base rates for digital display sites.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Alight Bus Shelter Media Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Fir Mill, Ltd v Royton U.D.C; J C Decaux UK Ltd ME v Valuation Officer; Alight Bus Shelter Media Limited v Valuation Officer
- Hearing
- 31 October 2024
Similar decisions
- ADVERTISING SITE 0404 0376 BUS SHELTER O/S SPRING HOUSE, GLOSSOP ROAD, S10 2PR — Allowed in part, 14 Nov 2024
- AD BOARD BUS SHELTER O/S KWICK FIT, 726 CITY ROAD, S2 1GJ — Allowed in part, 14 Nov 2024
- ADVERTISING SITE 0404 0354 BUS SHELTER OPP 22 ATLAS WAY, Brightside Lane, S9 2SR — Allowed, 17 Jun 2024
- Barclays, 2-12 Pinstone Street, S1 2HN — Dismissed, 29 May 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.