4th Flr 9, Appold Street, EC2A 2AA
Offices and Premises Decided 5 November 2025 CHG101111449 Knight Frank - Rating
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (ICS Medical Ltd), represented by Knight Frank LLP, challenged the rateable value of fourth floor office premises, arguing that refurbishment works in 2020 were merely a refresh of existing features and did not justify an increase from £390 to £440 per m². The tribunal found that the refurbishment created a refreshed Cat A blank canvas for fitting out, and was standard practice between tenants, not representing an enhancement to basic specification. It gave most weight to comparable rent evidence from 3rd Floor North in the same building (£382.22 per m²) and other Cat B lettings (averaging £393.50 per m²), determining that a tone of £390 per m² was reasonable, resulting in an RV of £1,010,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was ICS Medical Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Change of circumstances
- Change of circumstances
- refurbishment works
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Bunyan v Acenden Ltd
- Hearing
- 28 October 2025
Similar decisions
- Second Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
- Third Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
- First Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
- Fourth Floor, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hackney · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.