Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2017 rating list

145-146, New Street, B2 4NS

Shop and premises Decided 6 September 2024 CHG101114257 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£417,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£375,000−10% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£375,000from 21 Feb 2022

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a 35% end allowance for material change of circumstances due to recladding works and scaffolding at Attwood House affecting visibility and trading. The Valuation Officer had conceded a 10% allowance. The tribunal upheld the 10% allowance, finding that whilst the landlord reasonably granted rental concessions (40% and 30%) to maintain the landlord-tenant relationship and due to COVID-19 market pressures, a hypothetical new tenant would not command such favourable terms. Comparable assessments in the locality showed allowances of 5-20%, with the tribunal finding the works at the subject property less severe than comparables and the 10% allowance reasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lush Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances
  • Quantum or end allowance · decisive
Change of circumstances
recladding and scaffolding works
Evidence
Rents, Photographs, Settled assessments
Hearing
7 August 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.