Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

2nd Flr South, 23, Saville Row, W1S 2ET

Offices and premises Decided 7 August 2025 CHG101120560 CBRE - Ben Moore

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£685,000£1100/m²
Ratepayer sought£590,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£685,000£1100/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the main space rate of £1,100/m² applied to two office properties at 23 Savile Row, seeking reduction to £950/m². They argued that comparable rental evidence from 24 Savile Row, 10 New Burlington Street, and 1 New Burlington Place, which had lower rates of £1,007.50/m² or £950-£1,000/m², supported their challenge. The tribunal found that while the comparable properties were prime office locations, 23 Savile Row benefited from superior architectural features, unique site location, and comprehensive facilities that justified the higher rate. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding the existing assessments of £685,000 (2017-2020), £720,000 (2020-2023), and £1,690,000 were not unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
9 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.