Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2023 rating list

5TH FLR, 27, KNIGHTSBRIDGE, SW1X 7LY

Offices and premises Decided 11 March 2026 CHG101173575 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£520,000
Ratepayer sought£475,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£497,500from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (5TH FLR, 27, KNIGHTSBRIDGE, LONDON SW1X 7LY). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
3RD FLR RR, 27, KNIGHTSBRIDGE, LONDON SW1X 7LY£275,000£237,500£262,500Allowed in part
5TH FLR, 27, KNIGHTSBRIDGE, LONDON SW1X 7LYThis appeal£520,000£475,000£497,500Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable values of two office floors on the basis that the unadjusted rate of £700/m² applied by the Valuation Officer was excessive. The tribunal examined rental evidence from both the subject property (5th Floor with analysed rent of £667/m²) and comparable evidence, applying the principles from Lotus and Delta v Culverwell. The tribunal determined that an unadjusted rate of £665/m² was reasonable for both floors, reducing the RV from £275,000 to £262,500 for the 3rd Floor and from £520,000 to £497,500 for the 5th Floor, thereby allowing the appeal in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Aralon Advisory Services Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner and Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
13 February 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.