Office 1 fist floor Marlin House 40a Peterborough Road, SW6 3BN
Offices and premises Decided 4 March 2026 CHG101195731 Hanway Commercial - Mark Short
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the main space rates of £350/m² and £367.50/m² applied to three office properties, seeking a reduction to £200/m². The tribunal accepted that the existing assessments were excessive but not to the extent proposed. Placing greater weight on rental evidence from a March 2021 licence agreement analysed at £195.25/m² (close to the AVD of 1 April 2021) rather than the respondent's comparable property evidence, and adopting a cautious approach, the tribunal determined a main space rate of £300/m² was fair and reasonable, reducing the RVs accordingly.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was VIBEGOLD, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 6 February 2026
Similar decisions
- Second Floor, Solon House, SW6 3BN — Allowed in part, 4 Mar 2026
- First Floor, Solon House, SW6 3BN — Allowed in part, 4 Mar 2026
- Part First And Second Floors, Overlord House, Colet Gardens, Colet Gardens, W14 9DH — Allowed in part, 31 Oct 2025
- GRD PART 1ST-4TH LAWN HOUSE, 74, SHEPHERDS BUSH GREEN, W12 8SD — Agreed at hearing, 9 Oct 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.