Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · 2023 rating list

Office 1 fist floor Marlin House 40a Peterborough Road, SW6 3BN

Offices and premises Decided 4 March 2026 CHG101195731 Hanway Commercial

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£17,250
Ratepayer sought£9,400
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£14,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (OFFICE 1 FIRST FLOOR MARLIN HOUSE, 40A PETERBOROUGH ROAD, LONDON, SW6 3BN). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
FIRST FLOOR, SOLON HOUSE, 40A PETERBOROUGH ROAD, LONDON, SW6 3BN£36,000£20,500£30,750Allowed in part
SECOND FLOOR, SOLON HOUSE, 40A PETERBOROUGH ROAD, LONDON, SW6 3BN£28,750£16,500£24,750Allowed in part
OFFICE 1 FIRST FLOOR MARLIN HOUSE, 40A PETERBOROUGH ROAD, LONDON, SW6 3BNThis appeal£17,250£9,400£14,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the main space rates of £350/m² and £367.50/m² applied to three office properties, seeking a reduction to £200/m². The tribunal accepted that the existing assessments were excessive but not to the extent proposed. Placing greater weight on rental evidence from a March 2021 licence agreement analysed at £195.25/m² (close to the AVD of 1 April 2021) rather than the respondent's comparable property evidence, and adopting a cautious approach, the tribunal determined a main space rate of £300/m² was fair and reasonable, reducing the RVs accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was VIBEGOLD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
6 February 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.