Tribunals · Three Rivers District Council · 2023 rating list

GND FLR BUILDING 7, CROXLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, HATTERS LANE, HATTERS LANE, WD18 8PA

Offices and premises Decided 14 February 2025 CHG101199362 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeMixed
Original RV£630,000£270/m²
Ratepayer sought£540,000
VO conceded first£585,000−7% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£585,000£270/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the VO's valuation of office properties on Croxley Green Business Park was too high, particularly given the impact of Covid-19 on the office sector and home-working trends. The appellant cited rental evidence from broader locations and settled appeals, proposing lower unit rates per square metre. The tribunal partially allowed three of the four appeals, dismissing only the first property appeal where it found the VO's £270/m2 rate was supported by comparable rental evidence from Building 5 Croxley Green Business Park, and allowing the others at reduced rates of £285/m2, £300/m2 and £300/m2 respectively.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was De Lage Landen Leasing Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Valuation method
Change of circumstances
covid
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Hearing
15 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Three Rivers District Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.