1ST FLR WEST WING BUILDING 3, CROXLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, HATTERS LANE, HATTERS LANE, WD18 8YG
Offices and premises Decided 14 February 2025 CHG101223416 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the tone per square metre adopted by the VO for four office properties on Croxley Green Business Park and one on Marlins Meadow, arguing that the VO's approach was too narrow and failed to reflect Covid-19 impacts on the office sector. The tribunal allowed three appeals in part by adopting lower price per square metre valuations based on actual rental evidence from Croxley Green and comparable properties, but dismissed the first appeal as the VO's £270/m2 was justified by rent review evidence (Building 5 at £270.30/m2) and settled appeals.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was De Lage Landen Leasing Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Change of circumstances
- covid
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Hearing
- 15 January 2025
Similar decisions
- GND FLR BUILDING 7, CROXLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, HATTERS LANE, HATTERS LANE, WD18 8PA — Mixed, 14 Feb 2025
- UNIT 6 BUILDING 6, CROXLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, HATTERS LANE, HATTERS LANE, WD18 8YH — Mixed, 14 Feb 2025
- GND FLR BUILDING 2, MARLINS MEADOW, CROXLEY CENTRE, HATTERS LANE, HATTERS LANE, WD18 8YA — Mixed, 14 Feb 2025
All decisions in Three Rivers District Council · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.