Tribunals · Three Rivers District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 6 BUILDING 6, CROXLEY GREEN BUSINESS PARK, HATTERS LANE, HATTERS LANE, WD18 8YH

Offices and premises Decided 14 February 2025 CHG101199843 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeMixed
Original RV£630,000£300/m²
Ratepayer sought£540,000
VO conceded first£585,000−7% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£585,000£285/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the VO's rental valuation approach was too narrow, focusing only on Croxley Green Business Park, and failed to account for the impact of Covid-19 on office market values. They contended that the adopted price per square metre should be reduced across all four properties. The tribunal allowed three appeals in part, reducing valuations by applying lower unit rates based on comparable rental evidence from Croxley Green (particularly post-AVD lettings and reviews). One appeal (Building 7) was dismissed as the tribunal found the VO's £270/m2 was well-supported by Building 5 rental evidence at £270.30/m2.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was De Lage Landen Leasing Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
Change of circumstances
covid
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Hearing
15 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Three Rivers District Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.