46, HIGH STREET, SM7 2LX
Shop and premises Decided 18 May 2026 CHG101216812 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants sought reductions to the rateable values of three shop properties on High Street, Banstead, arguing for a zone A rate of £450/m2 instead of the existing £500/m2. The tribunal examined comparable rental evidence from three nearby properties, whose rents analysed to between £494.19/m2 and £526.41/m2. The tribunal preferred the Valuation Officer's analysis of the key comparable at 95 High Street (£514.99/m2) over the appellant's analysis (£483/m2), finding the existing zone A rate of £500/m2 was not unreasonable and consistent with the market evidence and prior assessments.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pearl Chemist Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 28 April 2026
Similar decisions
- 30, HIGH STREET, SM7 2LS — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- 111, HIGH STREET, SM7 2NL — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- Art Of Living, 72 High Street, RH2 9AP — Dismissed, 13 Nov 2024
All decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.