111, HIGH STREET, SM7 2NL
Shop and premises Decided 18 May 2026 CHG101220078 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants sought reductions from the rateable values on the basis of a lower zone A rate of £450/m2 compared to the existing assessments at £500/m2. The tribunal examined rental evidence from three comparable properties (95, 65, and 77 High Street), which analysed to between £494.19/m2 and £526.41/m2. The tribunal found the tribunal more persuaded by the Valuation Officer's analysis of the 95 High Street comparable and determined that the existing zone A rate of £500/m2 was not unreasonable, dismissing all three appeals.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pearl Chemist Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976]
- Hearing
- 28 April 2026
Similar decisions
- 46, HIGH STREET, SM7 2LX — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- 30, HIGH STREET, SM7 2LS — Dismissed, 18 May 2026
- Art Of Living, 72 High Street, RH2 9AP — Dismissed, 13 Nov 2024
All decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.