Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Reigate and Banstead Borough Council · 2023 rating list

30, HIGH STREET, SM7 2LS

Shop and premises Decided 18 May 2026 CHG101220076 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2023 list£33,000
Ratepayer sought£29,750
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£33,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (30 HIGH STREET, BANSTEAD SM7 2LS). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
30 HIGH STREET, BANSTEAD SM7 2LSThis appeal£33,000£29,750£33,000Dismissed
46 HIGH STREET, BANSTEAD SM7 2LX£65,500£59,000£65,500Dismissed
111 HIGH STREET, BANSTEAD SM7 2NL£23,250£21,000£23,250Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the zone A rate of £500/m2 used in the 2023 rating assessments, arguing for a reduction to £450/m2 to reflect market conditions and the Covid-19 pandemic. The tribunal examined comparable property rents on High Street, Banstead and found the three comparable rents analysed to between £494.19/m2 and £526.41/m2. Applying the principles established in Lotus & Delta, the tribunal was persuaded that the existing zone A rate of £500/m2 was not unreasonable and dismissed all three appeals.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pearl Chemist Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976]; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
28 April 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.