Ground Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX
Offices and premises Decided 30 April 2026 CHG101248455 Knight Frank – William Secrett/Knight Frank – William Secrett
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 7 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought end allowances for disturbance caused by a street market opening directly in front of the property, claiming 15% for ground floor, 11.5% for first floor and 6.5% for second floor, plus 1.5% amenity loss. The tribunal found the market had a negative impact on the property, affecting lettability and requiring increased pest control, and awarded 5% allowance for ground floors (as most affected), 3% for first floor and 2% for second floor. The tribunal rejected the appellant's requested allowances as too severe and did not accept the 1.5% amenity allowance for loss of parking spaces as the property had its own basement parking.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was LAUREL BROOK II LTD, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Quantum or end allowance
- Change of circumstances
- street market disturbance
- Evidence
- Expert report, Photographs, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Simpsons Malt Ltd and Other v Jones (VO) UKUT [2017] 460; Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 3926; Garton v Hunter [1968]
- Hearing
- 31 March 2026
Similar decisions
- Second Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
- Third Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
- First Floor North, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
- Fourth Floor, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX — Allowed in part, 30 Apr 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Hackney · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.