Tribunals · London Borough of Hackney · 2017 rating list

Ground Floor South, 40 Clifton Street, EC2A 4DX

Offices and premises Decided 30 April 2026 CHG101248457 Knight Frank – William Secrett

OutcomeMixed
Original RV£43,250
Ratepayer sought£34,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 1 Jun 2021

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 7 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant company argued for end allowances due to a street market operating outside the property, which was negatively impacting lettability and causing operational issues such as rodent problems and anti-social behaviour. The tribunal accepted that the market constituted a material change of circumstances and did cause negative impact, but awarded lower allowances than sought: 5% for ground floors, 3% for first floor, and 2% for second floor. The tribunal rejected the appellant's request for a 1.5% amenity allowance regarding loss of cycle parking, finding the evidence insufficient. Appeals for the basement and upper floors were dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was LAUREL BROOK II LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
street market
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report, Rents
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Garton v Hunter; Simpsons Malt Ltd v Jones; Denton v TH White Ltd
Hearing
31 March 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hackney · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.