Offices And Premises At 2Nd Floor, 62 Camden Road, NW1 9DR
Offices and premises Decided 19 June 2026 CHG101295919 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (a company) challenged the rateable value of second-floor office accommodation in a converted Victorian building located on a busy Camden Road high street. The tenant's licence included service charges and business rates. The appellant's surveyor adjusted the passing rent to isolate the net rent attributable to the property, applying proper deductions for business rates and service charges, and provided comparable evidence from similar period-converted office buildings and settlement agreements. The tribunal found the appellant's evidence more persuasive than the VO's limited comparable properties, which lacked supporting rental evidence and detailed information. The tribunal determined that a tone of £225/m² (rather than the original £399/m²) was reasonable, reducing the RV from £15,500 to £8,800 effective 1 April 2023, applying the Lotus & Delta v Culverwell framework.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was IMFRAVIS LTD, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 27 May 2026
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.