Second Floor, 23 Golden Square, W1F 9JP
Offices and premises Decided 12 May 2026 CHG101314685 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction from £32,750 to £13,680 RV, arguing a base price of £250/m² was appropriate based on comparables including 11 Argyll Street at £313.50/m². The Valuation Officer had reduced the RV to £21,000 at £385/m² by stripping out a gallery/retail element valued at £450/m² based on comparable evidence from 17-18 Golden Square. The tribunal found the VO's approach sound, accepting that the 17-18 Golden Square comparable was appropriate as nearby retail property for deriving the gallery value, and that £385/m² was reasonable for the office element. The appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was IPAC GLOBAL LTD, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 23 April 2026
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.