Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction to £15,000 RV, arguing that absence of natural light and split-level features affecting customer safety warranted a lower valuation. The Valuation Officer's representative demonstrated that the valuation of £15,250 was based on comparable rental evidence yielding £389.65/m² and a reasonable underlying value of £400/m², with a 5% layout allowance already applied. The tribunal found the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to disturb the existing assessment, noting that issues such as poor lighting and hazards were reflected in the passing rent.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Zoning or layout
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Vines Ltd v de Mauny; Ladies Hoisery and Underwear v West Middlesex AC
- Hearing
- 3 October 2019
Similar decisions
- Unit 1A, Swansea Enterprise Park, Llansamlet, Swansea, SA7 9RF — Allowed, 28 Sept 2026
- 5-7 Picton Arcade, Swansea, SA1 3BH. — Dismissed, 28 Aug 2026
- Shop & Premises, 235-237 Oxford Street, Swansea, SA1 3BL Matter Appealed Against: 2023 Non-Domestic Rating List — Agreed at hearing, 17 Jun 2026
- 1A & R/O 1-7, Richardson Road, Swansea, SA1 3TQ — Allowed in part, 29 Apr 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.