Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, represented by an agent, proposed reducing the rateable value from £47,500 to £31,250, based on rental evidence and comparable properties, arguing that a 52% reduction in zone A values since the previous list warranted a lower valuation. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that while it accepted the modern shop frontage as a positive feature, the appellant had not provided sufficient substantive evidence to justify the proposed reduction, and the 30% reduction already applied by the Valuation Officer between lists was appropriate given the location away from main pedestrianised areas.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was WEB2B LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report, Photographs
- Hearing
- 26 November 2019
Similar decisions
- 3A-4 Chester Street, Wrexham, LL13 8BD — Dismissed, 24 Nov 2021
- 5 Henblas Street, Wrexham LL13 8AD — Dismissed, 26 Nov 2020
- 56 Penybryn, Wrexham, LL13 7HU — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2019
- 4 Woodwards Walk, Acrefair, Wrexham LL14 3UY — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.