Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the property was overvalued compared to neighbouring shops and should be valued using a zonal method or on a basis comparable to other non-traditional shops in the area, which would result in approximately 40% reduction. The Valuation Officer contended the property, being a former public house with non-traditional layout, should be valued on an overall basis at £110/m2, supported by comparables evidence. The tribunal accepted the appellant had not fully undermined the Valuation Officer's approach to overall valuation but agreed the unit rate should be reduced from £110/m2 to £90/m2, allowing the appeal in part to £9,800.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Zoning or layout
- Evidence
- Rents, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Vines Ltd v de Mauny
- Hearing
- 13 February 2019
Similar decisions
- 3A-4 Chester Street, Wrexham, LL13 8BD — Dismissed, 24 Nov 2021
- 5 Henblas Street, Wrexham LL13 8AD — Dismissed, 26 Nov 2020
- 3B Priory Street, Wrexham LL11 1SU — Dismissed, 13 Jan 2020
- 4 Woodwards Walk, Acrefair, Wrexham LL14 3UY — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.