Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a small retail business operator, sought a reduction in rateable value from £26,750 to £9,000, arguing that the valuation was based on occupation by large chains and did not reflect current market conditions or the declined state of the town. However, the tribunal found the proposal invalid because the appellant specified an alteration date of 1st January 2019 when the actual alterations had been made on 12th November 2018 and 13th February 2019, contrary to the requirement under the Non-Domestic Rating (Alteration of Lists and Appeals) (Wales) Regulations 2005 to identify the correct alteration date.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 6 November 2020
Similar decisions
- 3A-4 Chester Street, Wrexham, LL13 8BD — Dismissed, 24 Nov 2021
- 3B Priory Street, Wrexham LL11 1SU — Dismissed, 13 Jan 2020
- 56 Penybryn, Wrexham, LL13 7HU — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2019
- 4 Woodwards Walk, Acrefair, Wrexham LL14 3UY — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.