Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant's agent requested an adjournment by email, claiming the need to obtain lease terms and rental information. The Valuation Officer objected, citing the agent's failure to follow the appeal process and lack of prosecution, noting that no substantive response had been received despite correspondence sent on multiple dates including a property inspection on 17 August 2023. The tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the agent's non-compliance with appeal procedures and failure to pursue the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was HS Consultancy Group, represented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 6 September 2023
Similar decisions
- Unit 59 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5YT — Dismissed, 6 Dec 2023
- Warehouse and Premises, 55 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5BD — Dismissed, 13 Sept 2023
- Factory and Premises, 60 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5YT — Dismissed, 13 Sept 2023
- Factory and Premises, 60 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5YT — Dismissed, 13 Sept 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.