Free news & data alerts
Tribunals · Wales · Cardiff · 2017 rating list

Part of First Floor, Golate House, 101 St Mary Street, Cardiff, CF10 1AT

Part of First Floor, office Decided 14 April 2025 681535711469/537NV17/10 Valuation Tribunal for Wales Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2017 list£53,500£99.56/m²
Ratepayer sought£35,000
VO conceded first£52,000−3% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£52,000£97/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to reduce the rateable value to £35,000 based on the passing rent analysis, while the Valuation Officer conceded to £52,000 using comparable property assessments. The tribunal accepted that whilst the subject rent was a relevant starting point under Lotus and Delta principles, it was too distant from the antecedent valuation date to be applied in isolation. The tribunal placed greater weight on comparable property assessments within and near the building which demonstrated a consistent tone of list at £97/m2, supporting the Valuation Officer's revised figure.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was CPS Group UK Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell; O'Brien v Harwood; Ladies Hosiery and Underwear v West Middlesex Assessment Committee
Hearing
1 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Cardiff ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Read it on valuationtribunalwales.net

Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.