Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, represented by a surveyor, challenged the property's rateable value by submitting rental evidence from comparable office properties within the local scheme, arguing for a unit rate of £70/m² and an RV of £44,750 compared to the Valuation Officer's valuation of £50,000 (£80/m²). The tribunal found that the comparable properties analysed to rates between £66/m² and £117/m², and having regard to the size of the appeal property (564.75m² ITMS) and the proximity of comparable rents to the antecedent valuation date, determined that the Valuation Officer's adopted rate of £80/m² was reasonable and fair. The appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Prince's Trust, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 11 December 2025
Similar decisions
- Unit 1, Ash Tree Court, Woodsy Close, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Pontprennau, Cardiff CF23 8RW — Dismissed, 20 Feb 2026
- 2nd Floor Unit G, Copse Walk, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Pontprennau, Cardiff CF23 8BB — Dismissed, 20 Feb 2026
- 2nd Floor Unit E, Copse Walk, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Pontprennau, Cardiff CF23 8BB — Dismissed, 20 Feb 2026
- Units 25 & 26. Neptune Court, Vanguard Way, Splott, Cardiff, CF24 5PJ — Dismissed, 19 Dec 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.