Gnd Fl Front 214, King Street, W6 0RA
Decided 3 March 2023 28768480 S J Associates
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend the hearing or submit a statement of case. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct, given the appellant's serious breach of procedural directions and absence of any substantive argument disputing the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 28 A & 28B, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 20, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 28, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 32, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.