Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · 2023 rating list

28 A & 28B, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH

Shop and premises Decided 9 July 2026 CHG101310149 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£39,250from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (28A & 28B GOLDHAWK ROAD, LONDON, W12 8DH). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
20 GOLDHAWK ROAD, LONDON, W12 8DH——£54,500Allowed in part
26A GOLDHAWK ROAD, LONDON, W12 8DH——£23,500Allowed in part
28 GOLDHAWK ROAD, LONDON, W12 8DH——£18,250Allowed in part
28A & 28B GOLDHAWK ROAD, LONDON, W12 8DHThis appeal——£39,250Allowed in part
32 GOLDHAWK ROAD, LONDON, W12 8DH——£15,750Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the adopted tone of £660 per m2, seeking a reduction to £540 per m2 across five properties on Goldhawk Road. The tribunal, examining rental evidence closest to the antecedent valuation date and considering the totality of evidence, found that £660 per m2 was unreasonable but that £540 per m2 was too low. The tribunal concluded that £590 per m2 was reasonable and allowed the appeals in part, reducing the rateable values accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AL-ANAKA LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
12 June 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.