Tribunals · London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · 2023 rating list

28 A & 28B, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH

Shop and premises Decided 9 July 2026 CHG101310149 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—£660/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£54,500£590/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 5 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the adopted tone of £660 per m2, seeking a reduction to £540 per m2 across five properties on Goldhawk Road. The tribunal, examining rental evidence closest to the antecedent valuation date and considering the totality of evidence, found that £660 per m2 was unreasonable but that £540 per m2 was too low. The tribunal concluded that £590 per m2 was reasonable and allowed the appeals in part, reducing the rateable values accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AL-ANAKA LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
12 June 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.