Amazon Delivery Box (Goblet) In Public Libary 87-91, Askew Road, W12 9AS
Decided 21 March 2023 28940638 Lambert Smith Hampton - Sheffield
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing and did not submit a statement of case to the Valuation Officer, despite proper notice of the hearing. The Tribunal proceeded in the appellant's absence and, given the failure to comply with directions and the absence of substantive argument disputing the rateable value, the Tribunal was satisfied that the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct and dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 28 A & 28B, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 20, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 28, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 32, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.