Amazon Delivery Box (Goblet) In Public Libary 87-91, Askew Road, W12 9AS
Decided 21 March 2023 28975053 Lambert Smith Hampton - Sheffield
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend the hearing or be represented, despite being notified. The appellant also failed to submit statements of case as required by the Tribunal's directions. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the entry in the 2010 rating list to be correct due to the appellant's serious procedural failures.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 28 A & 28B, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 20, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 32, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
- 28, GOLDHAWK ROAD, W12 8DH — Allowed in part, 9 Jul 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.