The Brent Hotel, 165 Preston Hill, Kenton, Kenton, HA3 9UY
Hotel and premises Decided 14 February 2022 CHG100131065 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the RV should be £13,000 based on fair maintainable trade method using post-AVD accounts showing FMT of £130,000. The tribunal found the appellant had traded for less than the required three years before AVD, and using accounts from the previous owner (who went into liquidation) was unreliable. The tribunal determined that a tone of the list had been established for hotels in the locality nearly five years into the 2017 list. Applying the double bed unit method at £2,400 per DBU for 12.94 units, the RV of £31,000 was supported by comparable properties and reflected the appeal property's disabilities, so the appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
- Evidence
- Trading accounts, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Futures (London) Ltd v Stratford; Irving Brown and Daughter v Smith; K Shoe Shops v Hardy; Arma Hotels Limited v Corkish
- Hearing
- 1 February 2022
Similar decisions
- The Salusbury, 50-52 Salusbury Road, NW6 6NN — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2023
- NURSERY 85, WEMBLEY PARK DRIVE, WEMBLEY, WEMBLEY, HA9 8HE — Dismissed, 27 Sept 2021
All decisions in London Borough of Brent · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.