Tribunals · London Borough of Brent · 2017 rating list

NURSERY 85, WEMBLEY PARK DRIVE, WEMBLEY, WEMBLEY, HA9 8HE

Day Nursery and Premises Decided 27 September 2021 CHG100320491 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£38,000£150/m²
Ratepayer sought£24,000
VO conceded first£31,750−16% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£31,750£125/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the appeal property should be valued at £94.86/m2, comparing it to Jennings Hall which had been assessed at the same rate in the 2010 list. The VO contended the property was not comparable to Jennings Hall and relied on three comparable properties supporting a rate of £125/m2. The tribunal found that while the VO's comparables had limitations (connected parties, location, mixed-use), the appeal property was in a better location than Jennings Hall and more impressive, warranting a higher valuation. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the £125/m2 rate correct and resulting in an RV of £31,750.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Learning Stars Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; K Shoe Shops v Hardy
Hearing
13 September 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Brent · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.